pinecore

Archive for 2009

Warrior Life? Not Quite

In Domestic, Fear on December 17, 2009 at 12:15 pm

The latest installment in my better-part-of-a-year-long series on domestic violence is out now—and, apparently, being stolen by the stackful from Santa Fe newsstands.

This chapter focuses on the so-called “fathers’ rights” movement, and goes in depth on the case of a wealthy local executive and Tea Party organizer who allegedly threatened his wife with a knife and “waterboarded” (in the wife’s words) their 2-year-old daughter. This was only the latest in a series of abuse allegations against the man, Josh Gonze, whose public advocacy work may have helped change the state child support law in favor of wealthy men such as himself.

Gonze is affiliated with more moderate, secular men’s groups. But his lawyer, David Standridge, seems to be a full-on Christian Patriarch. He writes in praise of “violent men who take the kingdom of God by force…men who are tired of the perversion, rudeness and slothfulness of [sic] as dictated by today’s culture.”

There’s also a thread in here about how the local daily dropped the ball in spotting an astroturf campaign, with serious consequences. Too bizarre. Read the story here. And read my previous domestic violence coverage in SFR here.

Just What Sort Of ‘New Age’ Will 2012 Bring?

In Domestic, Fear, Foreign on November 18, 2009 at 8:21 am

My new SFR cover feature digs into the 2012 craze. I’d be tempted to say this is a bit of fun, but when you think about it, this particular cultural phenomenon gets at some pretty serious issues. The collapse of American empire, for  instance.

MY OH MAYAN! — 2012 May Indeed Be The End Of The World As We Know It

The survivalists are running with this supposed ancient Mayan doomsday prophecy, of course. Playboy focused on the bunker-builders in a recent 2012 article. I spend more time with the New Agers, who are promising that 2012 will bring a planetary “evolution,” and explore the possibility that we’re really entering a new Dark Age of superstition.

Capitalist Cannibalism

In Domestic, Fear on October 28, 2009 at 7:57 am

Today’s SFR has the latest on the increasingly sordid tale of one of the largest corporate bankruptcies in history. Thornburg Mortgage has accused its former CEO and CFO of “misappropriation,” which is a nice word for theft. Was the board betrayed or are they throwing their former executives under the bus?

My previous stories about the company, capped by this profile of founder Garrett Thornburg, have been compiled here.

RGreeper

Real Estate Auctions Keep The PT Barnum Tradition Alive

In Cheer, Domestic on October 27, 2009 at 11:09 am

I was on KSFR a few weeks back, talking about the bait-and-switch tactics employed at a widely publicized condo auction in Santa Fe. Real estate auctions are the latest marketing gimmick to trick people into bad loans.

WordPress won’t let me embed the file without shelling out more money, which makes me angry enough to think about not renewing my service. (Like they care.) Anyway, here’s a link to the MP3. It’s a later segment.

My Santa Fe Reporter story that led to the interview generated a lot of interest and, I hope, saved a few people from getting ripped off. (Here’s my follow-up on the results of the auction, which a couple of attendees made to sound piss-poor.)

Third In A Series

In Domestic, Fear on October 15, 2009 at 9:02 am

10.14.09-Gilded-Cage-cover

Gilded cages: Even Santa Fe women of wealth and status get trapped by domestic violence

Update: SFR has compiled all my domestic violence coverage on a single page, and given it a name: Behind Closed Doors. It’s the place to go if you feel like staring into the abyss for a while.

The More You Look The Worse It Gets

In Domestic, Fear on August 5, 2009 at 2:24 am

Missed Opportunities

In Domestic, Fear on July 8, 2009 at 3:47 pm

Blogs Are Obsolete

In Uncategorized on July 6, 2009 at 9:16 pm

Updating this thing has proven to be a pain in the ass, as you might guess from the frequency of updates. So I’m moving the “blog” part of this site away from the front page. Maybe I’ll replace the whole thing with a Twitter feed… updated automatically by my reptile brain:
“Food now…sleep…lady…fertile?”

Survey Results Indicate

In Domestic, Foreign on June 8, 2009 at 4:06 pm

A) The survey is bogus

or,

B) Americans are morons

TSAsurvey

From an internal Homeland Security report on passenger pat-downs.

Agreed, Pretty Much

In Uncategorized on April 21, 2009 at 3:18 pm

Me and John Feffer, who writes that for propaganda purposes:

Pirates are the perfect threat. They’ve been around forever. They directly interfere with the bottom line, so the business community is on board. Unlike China, they don’t hold any U.S. Treasury Bonds. Indeed, since they’re non-state actors, we can bring virtually every country onto our side against them.

1 in 12

In Domestic on April 20, 2009 at 2:20 pm

921-tee_large“I started studying video game addiction…largely because I didn’t believe in it,” says the Iowa State psych prof whose nationwide study just concluded that 8.5 percent of American kids are addicted to video games.

I’ve covered this topic before at length. I’d still put myself in the “skeptic” category, but I have to admit that a big reason I’m still wavering on computer addiction is simply my own fear: If it really exists, the implications are far-reaching and terrifying.

After all, a console video game isn’t that much different than, say, Facebook. The physical activity is the same: Staring, pushing buttons. Stimulus, reward.

How is all this screen time re-wiring our brains? Who, if anyone, controls the medium? And to what end?

Does keeping a healthy distance from the computer make us more connected to our surroundings—or more isolated, because everybody else is plugged in?

Finally, is it self-defeating, or just silly, that I’m blogging about this subject?

One interesting finding in the Iowa State study: “Pathological gamers were also significantly more likely to have been involved in physical fights in the past year.”

Doesn’t he mean that gamers were more likely to lose a fight?

(Cross-posted at SFReeper.com)

New Hobby

In Fear on April 15, 2009 at 2:27 pm

Making safety signs.
safety
emergency1

Business Time: ‘The Big Slum’

In Domestic on April 8, 2009 at 10:04 am

stevebrombergf-lThis week’s Reporter cover: The House Thornburg Lost.

Some reaction: “This is a great read and it reminded me of a well-done Vanity Fair piece…”

And an excerpt:

Last week, after 14 years of growth and two years on life support, Thornburg Mortgage announced its bankruptcy. The word came on April Fools’ Day. Nobody laughed. Two days later, the company laid off 130 of 150 employees…
“Here’s this guy, a Harvard Business School alumni: Why in the hell did he come to Santa Fe, New Mexico to start up an investment and real estate company? He expected to become—and he did—a big fish in a small pond. That’s a peculiar kind of person. That’s a personality profile that leads people to think they’re the master of the universe,” Patrick Collins, a retired Wall Streeter who campaigned against Thornburg’s new Ridgetop Road headquarters, says.

And this, from an accompanying interview with Eric Janszen:

Can you put today’s economic situation in a historical perspective? Is there any parallel?

More than one-quarter of all homes have negative equity in the US. That’s a bad problem. But there’s a worse problem developing.

I refer to the American housing market as “the big slum.” A slum is where the market value has fallen below the replacement value. It doesn’t make sense to fix anything. You don’t fix it, you just let it go to hell. There’s no way to get your money back.

So in a tangible sense, the country is falling apart?

Yes. I just got back from a trip to Florida. I’ve been going down there for 20 years. It’s pretty striking. In Miami, South Beach, 20-30 percent of the businesses are out of business. Hotels, restaurants are boarded up with “for lease” signs. You can basically see the area is not doing well.

What’s happened is, we had this finance-based economy that was very dependent on continuous debt creation. That’s suddenly dried up.

Have we had an economy like this in the past? Yeah, we did in the 1920s.

Gun Target Yoga

In Domestic, Fear on April 4, 2009 at 9:42 am

Over at Harper’s, Ken Silverstein calls for Stephen Colbert to investigate why gun sales have increased.  Which reminds me to post the lively FreeRepublic thread on my gun-and-gold-hoarding story from back in December.

And by lively, I mean this: “Corey is obviously a liberal bedwetter, but this report ties in with the hundreds of others we’ve seen from every part of the country.”

Eventually, I’ll get around to adding that to the insult wall, although I believe it technically counts as grudging praise.

The Freepers also have an earnest discussion about what kind of fool would think a chainsaw could actually be used in self-defense, as I suggested at the close of that article.

I am backing away slowly now…

Anyway, here’s a couple of my other recent stories from the Reporter, just as ominous as the growing weapons stockpiles in rural America: A strip-mall yoga cult (?) and the impending downfall of Target.

He Told You So

In Fear on March 9, 2009 at 6:32 pm

Update: They threw this up over at CounterPunch.

When it comes to the fate of the world, should we listen to Chris Hedges or Jeffrey Goldberg?

Let’s start with Hedges. Here’s the nut of the argument he’s been pushing lately. Warning: It’s a serious bummer.

At no period in American history has our democracy been in such peril or has the possibility of totalitarianism been as real. Our way of life is over. Our profligate consumption is finished. Our children will never have the standard of living we had. And poverty and despair will sweep across the landscape like a plague. This is the bleak future. There is nothing President Obama can do to stop it. It has been decades in the making. It cannot be undone with a trillion or two trillion dollars in bailout money. Our empire is dying. Our economy has collapsed.

And so on and so forth.

Goldberg’s response? “Man, That Chris Hedges is Excitable.”

That’s it. That’s his whole response.

I’m not going to get into the merits of Hedges’ argument here, although similarly gloomy thoughts must have crossed the mind of anyone who still reads the newspaper every day. Let’s just pause for a moment to consider who we’re dealing with.

Hedges, a former New York Times war correspondent, launched his Bush-era career as a doom-prophet with a dense philisophical tract called “War Is A Force That Gives Us Meaning,” in which he warned against the seductions of state-sanctioned violence. By 2007, he’d sharpened his rhetoric with “American Fascists.” You might be able to guess who he had in mind.

From what I’ve heard, Hedges is, personally, a bit of a know-it-all and a jerk. I’ve never met the man. But I do know that, on the big issues of the era, Hedges turned out to be basically right.

Of course, nobody wanted to listen when it mattered. Now, lo and behold, less than three months into the Obama administration, we get confirmation that Hedges, and all the other “excitable” lefties, were right on target. Bush’s lawyers had decided that he could do whatever he wanted, even deploy the military on American soil. As Scott Horton of Harper’s put it on Olbermann’s show the other night, the United States was a dictatorship for eight years without anybody realizing it.

Part of the reason few people grasped the extent of democracy’s decline is because their ideas were rarely allowed into print during the early years of the “war on terror.” There were a good number of writers who, like Hedges, sensed that Bush’s program was essentially totalitarian before the lies behind the Iraq war were widely understood, before the domestic wiretapping exposes, before waterboarding entered the vernacular.

We’ll never know how many warning bells were muffled by cowardice and complacency.

As someone who had mainstream editors reject his anti-war on terror pitches as “hysterical,” I feel Hedges’ pain here, even as I hope that his predictions are too pessimistic.

It’s bad form to say, “I told you so,” but screw manners–this is too serious. Have we learned nothing from our mistakes during those dark years? Some people were right and other people were wrong. And it’s utterly sickening to see that the people who were wrong, like Goldberg, are still getting paid to mock the people who were right, like Hedges.

Oh yes. What about Goldberg? He egged on the warmongers. Then, after things got weird with the peaceniks at the New Yorker, he moved to the Atlantic, which ran long essays arguing that maybe torture was OK sometimes. Remember those?

But let’s not get personal. Journalists are only as good as their sources, right?

Hedges’ sources, in his first book of the Bush years, were grunts and bomb victims. Excitable, indeed.

I remember sitting in a New School classroom in 2003, listening to Goldberg–suave in a way that Chris “Monotone” Hedges will never be–chummily interview Paul Wolfowitz. Screw that noise.

Rain Men

In Domestic on March 4, 2009 at 9:13 am

johnherseywlogo-l Four thousand words on rain-making: Why not? This story has everything but sex. Well, there is a passing mention of castration. And “seeding” clouds carries a bit of symbolism, no? Here’s the nut of my story this week on weather control:

Its most enthusiastic proponents say cloud seeding is more than a boon to high-desert farmers—it is a way to save civilization from its own excesses.

As the world enters a water crisis—driven by the collective thirst of 6 billion and exacerbated by the frightening consequences of global warming—the cloud seeders, a quirky group of weathermen and flyboys, say they can actually do what the Pueblo people can only pray for: They can bring rain.

Sometimes. Maybe.

If that doesn’t satisfy your weird-science, here’s a few hundred words on the feds’ plan to stop drunk drivers with laser beams.

“Health care, energy and education…”

In Uncategorized on February 24, 2009 at 7:43 pm

obamasotu1
ZZZZzzzzz…

O-bomba

In Uncategorized on February 21, 2009 at 1:03 pm

obamaradiationToday’s New York Times editorial hits on the same subject I covered in this week’s article for the Reporter: What does Obama intend to do with the nation’s nuclear weapons complex?

We both argue the proposed transfer of responsibility for nukes from the Energy Department to the Pentagon speaks to bigger issues.

From my piece:

Greg Mello, director of independent Los Alamos Study Group, says the proposal fits with a long-term plan by some disarmament advocates to collapse the nuclear weapons programs as much as possible into New Mexico, thus limiting congressional resistance to weapons cuts. Mello opposes the move. “There is a risk of creating a citadel,” he says. “If we’re not careful, we can move to a whole ’nother level of military occupation.”

The Times concludes, “Wherever the weapons complex is situated bureaucratically, it will have to be modernized, reduced in size and managed a lot more carefully.”

Way to go out on a limb there, guys.

They did propose that a new (or newly independent) agency, reporting directly to the Prez, take charge of nukes, which may be a better idea than handing them over to Robert Gates. Unfortunately, civilians have proven just as irresponsible with the weapons complex as you’d expect professional war-makers to be.

***

Speaking of O-bomba, what the hell is all this about? An “expansion” of the covert war in Pakistan, and–

another sign that President Obama is continuing, and in some cases extending, Bush administration policy in using American spy agencies against terrorism suspects in Pakistan… At the same time, Mr. Obama has begun to scale back some of the Bush policies on the detention and interrogation of terrorism suspects, which he has criticized as counterproductive.

So, we won’t torture you anymore, we’ll just bomb your family.

Do we just all of a sudden have better intelligence about who’s hiding where in Pakistan? Probably not. So if Obama has a lucky streak in Pakistan–or, knock on wood, nets bin Laden–then it’s going to raise a lot of new questions about the Bush administration. (As in, whose ass were they covering that they couldn’t get the guy?) But if Obama merely widens the war because nobody around him has a better idea, then, well…good morning Vietnam!

‘Found’ Email

In Domestic on February 13, 2009 at 4:22 pm

Shocking! Posted earlier at my newspaper’s blog, under “How To Save Newspapers”:

From: Andy Dudzik [publisher]
Date: February 13, 2009 06:47:01 AM MST
To: SFR staff-all
Subject: Revenue Opportunities

Good morning everyone:
I trust you’ve all seen this morning’s Journal and New Mexican. If you haven’t, here:

http://www.abqjournal.com/north/131153408015north02-13-09.htm

http://www.santafenewmexican.com/SantaFeNorthernNM/Police–Newspaper-vendor-sold-heroin

A newspaper vendor, selling heroin? Right there, on the street, in plain view! In our little city!

It’s shocking, I know. And I’m sure your questions were the same as mine: How could this happen? Why didn’t we think of this first? We are the “alt” paper, after all. We are supposed to be on the “cutting edge.” Our readers are stoned most of the time. The synergy is obvious, and I’m not BS-ing with you all when I say: Sorry. I should’ve thought of that.

But you know what? It’s never too late. So today I’d like to announce the appointment of our new Assistant “Distribution” Manager, T. That’s “T” like “Mr. T,” but I’m telling you now, for your own sake, don’t call him that. Ever.

T comes to us from, most recently, a cooperative agriculture “freedom zone” in unincorporated Santa Fe County. Prior to that, he was in jail. T brings to us a depth of experience in distribution and trafficking, and I’ve asked him to conceive and manage our new “party in the box” campaign, at selected SFR boxes around the city. I’m expecting 110 percent support from all of you on this. If T asks you to carry a package for him, or call for pizza, drop whatever you’re doing and do it.

Read the rest of this entry »

Stars & Stripes & Stars

In Domestic, Fear, Foreign on February 11, 2009 at 11:14 am

In this week’s Santa Fe Reporter, I’ve got a piece on a few New Mexico soldiers who just returned from a year-long deployment to Guantanamo Bay.

Not a planet

Not a planet

And this morning I got some correspondence about an article that ran last week, on how the recession is good for shrinks, shamans and psychics.

Heather—”a private, not a public, astrologer”—writes:

Many of us saw this Recession coming several years ago. It’s sad.

It’s all about Pluto and how it’s lining up in the U.S. Chart. Pluto will move out of this position in early 2011. How we fare will depend on how creative our responses are during this Recession.

The Great Depression was also all about Pluto too.

Tim Geithner, take note.

Now It’s Creepy

In Domestic, Fear on February 3, 2009 at 6:26 pm

It’s February. Two weeks since the inauguration. Three months since the election. And still almost every magazine cover at Border’s seems to front the new President’s face.

I said it before, and I’ll keep saying it until people notice: This is weird!

When other countries plaster the Leader’s face everywhere, we call it a personality cult. We tend to think it’s a bad thing.

I get it, OK? The whole Bush-be-gone thing is a huge relief for everyone on the planet who doesn’t own shares in KBR.

And I get that all these magazines (and TV shows, and Pepsi Co., etc.) are just cashing in on what is, to some extent, a ground-up phenomenon. (Of course, if you buy Jacques Ellul, the kind of propaganda that gets churned out by New York advertising agencies and Washington think tanks may be less insidious than the kind that springs from the minds of ordinary people.)

My point here is that this President-worship is dangerous, just as it was dangerous after 9/11, when everybody thought W. was, you know, “stoic” and “resolute” and “steadfast” and all those other words that used to run under pictures of him, jaw clenched.

Let’s remember: Obama hasn’t done much to change our course yet, except promise to close the Cuban gulag (Bush made a similar promise) and continue to bomb the tribal areas in Pakistan, which, as Bill Moyers pointed out the other night, just as dangerous and stupid as it was when Bush was doing it.

A Catalogue of Coincidences

In Domestic on January 28, 2009 at 9:13 am

I went through pretty much every major donor to Bill Richardson’s presidential and gubernatorial campaigns, then tried to find out which ones had business with the state of New Mexico. This was a lot more work than I imagined. I’m all databased out.

Anyway, here’s my new Santa Fe Reporter cover story, “Pay to Play A-Z: SFR’s Guide To Government Contracting Under Governor Bill Richardson.”

Turns out 26 letters wasn’t enough.

And here, because it’s hilarious, is the Letterman bit I used in the opener.

One Day We Will Think of Golf Like We Think of Fox Hunting

In Domestic on January 21, 2009 at 8:47 am

From Gannett Blog via Romenesko:

Last Friday, Gannett newspaper division chief Bob Dickey traveled to Arizona to deliver bad news to dozens of employees. Citing the “difficult economy,” he said the nation’s No. 1 newspaper publisher planned to shutter the Tucson Citizen, the state’s oldest continuously published daily …

I will now tell you how one of Gannett’s highest-paid executives…is sharing that hardship.

CaddyshackDickey is in Palm Springs, the Southern California winter resort where the company is spending a bundle this week on one of pro golf’s biggest corporate schmooze-fests: the Bob Hope Chrysler Classic pro-am tournament, starting [today]. With much of the nation shivering, this desert oasis made famous by Hollywood royalty is looking forward to mid-70s temperatures today.

Stickball, now there’s a game.

And Money. And Good Criminal Defense Lawyers. A Time Machine Would Be Nice, Too.

In Domestic on January 11, 2009 at 3:22 pm

gopbushwapo
(From washingtonpost.com today.)